print

Correlational findings

Study Hart et al. (2018): study ZZ Europe 2014

Public
18+ aged, urban areas, European countries, 2014
Survey name
INT-SPOTLIGHT survey
Sample
Respondents
N = 5205
Non Response
89.2%
Assessment
Questionnaire: Conputer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Aesthetics in neighborhood
Our Classification
Remarks
Assessed using Google Street View
Distribution
Range: 0.19-0.71, M = 0.52+-0.13
Related specification variables
Operationalization
% of streets with public parks; trees; good condition residential buildings etc.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-g-sq-v-5-f ORO = + p < .001 Odds for being…          ORO    CI95
- very happy             1,28   [1,16;1,42]
- moderately happy       1.19   [0,07;1,32]
- neutral                1,11   [0.97;1,28]
- unhappy (reference)

ORO  controled for:
- age
- gender
- children in household
- education
- employment
- region of residence

ORO similar across
- age
- gender
- children in household
- education
- employment
- region of residence
- amount of leisure time spend in neighourhood