print

Correlational findings

Study Hart et al. (2018): study ZZ Europe 2014

Public
18+ aged, urban areas, European countries, 2014
Survey name
INT-SPOTLIGHT survey
Sample
Respondents
N = 5205
Non Response
89.2%
Assessment
Questionnaire: Conputer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Functionality in neighborhood
Our Classification
Remarks
Assessed using Google Street View
Distribution
Range: 0.12-0.69, M = 0.38+-0.15
Related specification variables
Operationalization
% street with structured neighborhood and well  maintained street segments, paths and bus stops etc.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-g-sq-v-5-f ORO = - ns EMPLOYED
Odds for being…           ORO    CI95
- very happy             0,94   [0,77;1,14]
- moderately happy       0.98   [0,80;1,18]
- neutral                1,07   [0.84;1,36]
- unhappy (reference)
O-HL-g-sq-v-5-f ORO = - p < .05 UNEMPLOYED
Odds for being…           ORO    CI95
- very happy             0,69   [0,55;0,87]
- moderately happy       0.80   [0,59;1,10]
- neutral                0,92   [0.65;0,95]
- unhappy (reference)
O-HL-g-sq-v-5-f ORO = - p < .05 RETIRED
Odds for being…           ORO    CI95
- very happy             0,66   [0,52;0,84]
- moderately happy       0.74  [0,58;0,93]
- neutral                0,75   [0.60;0,95]
- unhappy (reference)

Relative Risk Ratios (RRR) controled for
- personal characteristics
  - age
  - gender
- other neighbourhood characteristics
  - functionality: e.g. maintenance of streets
  - destination: location of neighourhood

Significance (p<.05) denotes higher correlation with functionality of streets