Study Hart et al. (2018): study ZZ Europe 2014
- Public
- 18+ aged, urban areas, European countries, 2014
- Survey name
- INT-SPOTLIGHT survey
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 5205
- Non Response
- 89.2%
- Assessment
- Questionnaire: Conputer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI)
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Functionality in neighborhood
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- Assessed using Google Street View
- Distribution
- Range: 0.12-0.69, M = 0.38+-0.15
- Related specification variables
-
-
- Operationalization
- % street with structured neighborhood and well maintained street segments, paths and bus stops etc.
Observed Relation with Happiness
Odds for being… ORO CI95
- very happy 0,94 [0,77;1,14]
- moderately happy 0.98 [0,80;1,18]
- neutral 1,07 [0.84;1,36]
- unhappy (reference)
Odds for being… ORO CI95
- very happy 0,69 [0,55;0,87]
- moderately happy 0.80 [0,59;1,10]
- neutral 0,92 [0.65;0,95]
- unhappy (reference)
Odds for being… ORO CI95
- very happy 0,66 [0,52;0,84]
- moderately happy 0.74 [0,58;0,93]
- neutral 0,75 [0.60;0,95]
- unhappy (reference)
Relative Risk Ratios (RRR) controled for
- personal characteristics
- age
- gender
- other neighbourhood characteristics
- functionality: e.g. maintenance of streets
- destination: location of neighourhood
Significance (p<.05) denotes higher correlation with functionality of streets