print

Correlational findings

Study Hart et al. (2018): study ZZ Europe 2014

Public:
18+ aged, urban areas, European countries, 2014
Survey name:
INT-SPOTLIGHT survey
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 5205
Non Response:
89.2%
Assessment:
Questionnaire: web

Correlate

Authors's Label
actual functionality in neighborhood
Our Classification
Remarks
Assessed using Google Street View
Distribution
Range: 0.12-0.69, M = 0.38+-0.15
Related specification variables
Operationalization
% street with structured neighborhood and well  maintained street segments, paths and bus stops etc.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-H?-?-sq-v-5-f ORO = - ns Employed population
dds for being…           ORO    CI95
- very happy             0,94   [0,77;1,14]
- moderately happy       0.98   [0,80;1,18]
- neutral                1,07   [0.84;1,36]
- unhappy (reference)
O-H?-?-sq-v-5-f ORO = - p < ..05 Unemployed population
dds for being…           ORO    CI95
- very happy             0,69   [0,55;0,87]
- moderately happy       0.80   [0,59;1,10]
- neutral                0,92   [0.65;0,95]
- unhappy (reference)
O-H?-?-sq-v-5-f ORO = - p < ..05 Retired population
dds for being…           ORO    CI95
- very happy             0,66   [0,52;0,84]
- moderately happy       0.74  [0,58;0,93]
- neutral                0,75   [0.60;0,95]
- unhappy (reference)
elative Risk Ratios (RRR) controled for
- personal characteristics
  - age
  - gender
- other neighbourhood characteristics
  - functionality: e.g. maintenance of streets
  - destination: location of neighourhood

Significance (p<.5) denotes higher correlation with functionality of streets