print

Correlational findings

Study Hart et al. (2018): study ZZ Europe 2014

Public
18+ aged, urban areas, European countries, 2014
Survey name
INT-SPOTLIGHT survey
Sample
Respondents
N = 5205
Non Response
89.2%
Assessment
Questionnaire: Conputer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Traffic safety
Our Classification
Remarks
Assessed using Google Street View
Distribution
Range: 0.01-0.62,. M = 0,26+-0.14
Related specification variables
Operationalization
% streets in neighbourhood with e.g. pedrestrian crossings and trafic lights

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-g-sq-v-5-f F = 1,91 ns Mean safety score;
- very happy             0,27
- moderately happy       0,26
- neutral                0,27
- unhappy                0,26
O-HL-g-sq-v-5-f ORO = - ns EMPLOYED
Odds for being…           ORO    CI95
- very happy             0,92   [0,74;1,15]
- moderately happy       0.96   [0,77;1,20]
- neutral                1,06   [0.84;1,34]
- unhappy (reference)
O-HL-g-sq-v-5-f ORO = - p < .05 UNEMPLOYED
Odds for being…           ORO    CI95
- very happy             0,72   [0,58;0,89]
- moderately happy       0.86   [0,67;1,12]
- neutral                0,97   [0.74;1,26]
- unhappy (reference)
O-HL-g-sq-v-5-f ORO = - p < .05 RETIRED
Odds for being…           ORO    CI95
- very happy             0,70   [0,55;0,89]
- moderately happy       0.74   [0,60;0,90]
- neutral                0,76   [0.60;0,97]
- unhappy (reference)

ORO  controled for:
- age
- gender
- children in household
- education
- employment
- region of residence

ORO similar across
- age
- gender
- children in household
- education
- region of residence
- amount of leisure time spend in neighourhood