print

Correlational findings

Study Kansky et al. (2019): study US 2003

Public:
Teenagers USA, followed 11 years 200?-200?
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 166
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: telephone (CATI)

Correlate

Authors's label
Romantic Conflict in Adulthood
Our Classification
Error Estimates
Cronbach Alpha: self report 0.79: partner report 0.72
Remarks
Conflict subscale of the Network of Relationships Inventory (Furman& Burmester 1985) and the 27-item negative conflict subscale of the Conflict in Relationship Scale (Wolfe et al 1994) Average of annual assesment at ages 23, 24 and 25
Distribution
Self: M: 0, SD: 0.9, Partner: M: 0; SD: 0.88
Operationalization
Self report of current conflict with partner on 75 questions
Text of question not reported:

A) Self
B) Romantic partner report

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-AB-m-mq-ol-101-a r = - T1 age 14 happiness by T2 age 23-25 romantic conflict

SELF report
Positive Affect r -.18
Negative Affect r -.01
Hence, correlation with affect balance must be negative
A-AB-m-mq-ol-101-a r = - PARTNER report
Positive Affect r -.24
Negative Affect r -.01
Hence, correlation with affect balance must be negative