print

Correlational findings

Study Kansky et al. (2019): study US 2003

Public
Teenagers USA, followed 11 years 2003-2014
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 166
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Relationship Satisfaction in Adulthood
Our Classification
Error Estimates
Cronbach Alpha 0.89
Remarks
Relationship Assessment Scale (Hendrick . Etal 1998) Average of annual assesments at age 23, 24, 25
Distribution
M: 30.39, SD: 4.34
Operationalization
Sellfreport on 7 questions about
- regrets about the relationship (reverse)
- general satisfaction
- whether expectations have been met
- how well the partner meets one's needs
- love for one's partner
- problems in the relationship (reversed)

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-AB-m-mq-ol-101-a r = + T1 age 14 happiness by T2 age 23-25 relationship satisfaction

Positive Affect r +.09
Negative Affect r -.03
Hence, correlation with affect balance must be positive