print

Correlational findings

Study Yucel & Minnotte (2017): study US 2007

Public
Working population, USA, 2007 - 2008
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 2594
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Physical health
Our Classification
Distribution
Mean = 2,10
SD =     0,69
Operationalization
measured with one question: How would you rate your current state of health- excellent, good, fair, or poor? Responses to this question ranged from 1 = excellent to 4 = poor and the item was reverse coded, such that higher scores indicate better physical health.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-q r = + p < .001 r = 0,31 O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-q b = + p < .001 b = 0,207
adjusted for organizational support, supervisor support, coworker support, family support,  children in the household, gender, family income, work hours, education, race, age, relationship status.

b = 0.089
when aditionally adjusted for work-family conflict and its interactions with support of organisation, supervisor and coworkers

b = 0.089
when additionally adjusted for poor mental health status and its interactions with support of organisation, supervisor and coworkers