Study Winters & Li (2015): study US 2005
- Public
- 18-85 aged, 2361 counties, USA 2005
- Survey name
- US-BRFSS 2010
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 19420490
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI)
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Metro status and size
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- all regressions include month and year dummies.
- Distribution
-
M= a:0.176, b:0.151, c:0.221, d:0.202, e: 0.147
SD=a:0.381, b:0.358, c:0.415, d:0.401, e: 0.354 - Operationalization
- Thousands Inhabitants of the county
1 Urban
a: .Micropolitian
b: .Small metropolitian (0-250)
c: .Medium metropolitian (250.-1000)
d: .Large metropolitiam (1000- 4000)
e: .very large metropolitan (<4000)
0 non-urban (reference)
Observed Relation with Happiness
- Micropolitan +.0158 (01)
- Small metropolitan: +.0236 (01)
- Medium metropolitan +.0159 (01)
- Large metropolitan +.0075 (ns)
- very large metropolitan +.0006 (ns)
- Micropolitan -.0009 (ns)
- Small metropolitan: -.0007 (ns)
- Medium metropolitan +.0159 (ns)
- Large metropolitan -.0146 (01)
- very large metropolitan -.0210 (01)
- Micropolitan -.0047 (10)
- Small metropolitan: -.0047 (ns)
- Medium metropolitan -.0140 (01)
- Large metropolitan -.0220 (01)
- very large metropolitan -.0257 (01)
- Micropolitan -.0047 (10)
- Small metropolitan: -.0047 (ns)
- Medium metropolitan -.0135 (01)
- Large metropolitan -.0206 (01)
- very large metropolitan -.0186 (01)
- Micropolitan -.0116 (01)
- Small metropolitan: -.0190 (01)
- Medium metropolitan -.0334 (01)
- Large metropolitan -.0489 (01)
- very large metropolitan -.0604 (01)