print

Correlational findings

Study Abbott et al. (2011): study ZZ Various nation sets 2001

Public:
Adults, general public, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia and Georgia, 2001
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 2000
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Freedom of choice and control
Our Classification
Remarks
AUTHOR: CHECK SIGNS OF CORRELATION
Operationalization
Self report on question about on the extent to which the respondent had free choice anf control over their life
1: choice to none at all
  :
5: a great deal of freedom

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-c Beta = +.13 p < .01 Beta controled for futher aspects of empowerment:
- Political influence
- Basic freedom
- Control
- Education
- Social recource
- Personal support
- Age
- Gender
- Nationality
- Trust
O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-c Beta = -.12 p < .001 Beta additionally controled for:
- Age
- Gender
- Economic situation
  - evaluation of situation as good/bad
  - sufficiency of income
- social cohesion
  - trust in people
  - trust in government
  - fear of crime
- Social integration
  - active member of voluntary organization
  - Social, resources
  - personal support
  - nationality: identification with main ethnic group
  - married
  - employed
O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-c Beta = -.16 p < .001 Beta additionally controled for country