print

Correlational findings

Study Abbott et al. (2011): study ZZ Various nation sets 2001

Public:
Adults, general public, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia and Georgia, 2001
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 2000
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Political influence
Our Classification
Remarks
Order changed by WhDT
Operationalization
Self report on question about the extent of influence on national and regional government
1: low
  :
4: high

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-c Beta = +.20 p < .001 Beta contuled for other aspects of empowerment:
- Basic fredoms
- Freedom of choice and control
- Control
- selfrated health
- Education
O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-c Beta = +.04 p < .01 Beta additionally controled for:
- Age
- Gender
- Economic situation
  - evaluation of situation as good/bad
  - sufficiency of income
- social cohesion
  - trust in people
  - trust in government
  - fear of crime
- Social integration
  - active member of voluntary organization
  - Social, resources
  - personal support
  - nationality: identification with main ethnic group
  - married
  - employed
O-SLW-c-sq-v-4-c Beta = +.04 p < .05 Beta additionally controled for country
- Freedom of choice and control