Study Ki (2009): study HK 2006
- Public
- Health care professionals, Hong Kong, 2006
- Survey name
- Unnamed study
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 161
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Gratitude intervention
- Our Classification
-
-
- Distribution
- 1: N = 90 (77 in analysis), 0: N = 90 (84 in analysis)
- Operationalization
- Participants were randomly assigned to:
1. GRATITUDE INTERVENTION.
Participants had to write down at least one grateful event twice a week for 4 consecutive weeks.
0: CONTROL (HASSLES)
Participants had to write down at least one hassle event twice a week for 4 consecutive weeks.
Observed Relation with Happiness
Gratitude 1,17 1,60 +0,43
Control (hassles) 1,02 0,48 -0,54
-DIFFERENCE +0,97
Gratitude + 5,4%
Control (hassles) - 6,7%
-DIFFERENCE +12,1%
Happiness assessed at:
T0 = baseline
T1 = post intervention