Study Peters et al. (2017): study ZZ 2012
- Public
- Patients with chronic pain, Netherlands and Belgium, 2012-2013
- Survey name
- Unnamed study
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 206
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Questionnaire: Conputer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI)
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Internet based Positive Psychology Intervention
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- Randomization was performed with a 2:2:1 ratio with an overrepresentation of participants in the 2 treatment conditions, and a set upper limit of 50 participants in the control condition
- Distribution
-
1: baseline N = 114, post treatment N = 85, follow-up n = 43
0A: baseline N = 112, post-treatment n = 80, follow-up N = 55
0B: baseline N = 50, post-treatment N = 41 - Operationalization
- Participants were randomly assigned to:
1. PPI: INTERNET BASED POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY INTERVENTION. 8 weekly modules aimed at self-compassion, awareness of suffering, three good things, planning and recall pleasant memories, savoring, optimism and best-possible self.
0A: iCBT: INTERNET COGNITIVE BEHAVORIAL THERAPY. 8 weekly modules aimed at pain education, relaxation, cognitive restructuring, activity planning, stress management, asssertivenss training, problem=solving techniques and coping.
0B: WAITLIST CONTROL. No program.
Observed Relation with Happiness
PPI 3,63 4.47 4.25 +0.84 +0,62
iCBT 3,80 4,35 4,23 +0,55 +0,43
Control 4,00 3,85 -0,15
- PPI VS CONTROL +0,99
PPI +16,8% +12,4%
iCBT +11,0% + 8,6%
Control - 3,0%
- PPI VS CONTROL +19,8%
Happiness measured at:
T0 = baseline
T1 = post-treatment
T2 = 6 months follow-up (only PPI and iCBT)