print

Correlational findings

Study Dyrbye et al. (2016): study US 2012

Public:
Physicians, USA, 2012
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 279
Non Response:
Assessment:
Questionnaire: web

Correlate

Authors's Label
Online intervention on wellbeing
Our Classification
Distribution
1: N = 145 (analyzed n = 137),
0: N = 145 (analyzed n = 142)
Operationalization
Participants were randomly assigned to:
1.INTERVENTION.
During 10 weeks participants weekly received a menu of 5-6 tasks and were asked to select and complete one task of their choosing weekly. Tasks were: reflection on meaningful experience, writing a thank-you letter, plan an outing, recognizing personal strenghts, problem solving and consider three good things they are grateful for. In addition to tasks, each week surveys had to be completed.
0:CONTROL
Participants only completed weekly surveys during 10 weeks

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-QL?-?-sq-ol-11-a DM = + p < .001                            T0    T1      T1-T0
Intervention               6,8   7,3     +0,5
Control                    6,8   7,3     +0,5
- Intervention vs Control                 0,0
O-QL?-?-sq-ol-11-a D%sr = + p < .001                                          T1-T0
Intervention                             +5,0%
Control                                  +5,0%
- Intervention vs Control                 0,0%

Happiness assessed at:
T0: baseline
T1: end of study 10 weeks later