print

Correlational findings

Study Lin (2016): study CN Hangzhou 2011

Public
17+ aged general public, Hangzhou city, China 2011-2012
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 3000
Non Response
Assessment
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Socio-economic security index
Our Classification
Remarks
Computation: a/3+b/7+c/3
Distribution
M =0.28
Operationalization
Index of
a: Family expense
b: Family income once a job is lost
c: Family income status
1: high
0: low

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-g-sq-n-10-b r = +.19 p < .01 O-HL-g-sq-n-10-b b = +2.2 p < .01 b controled for:
- objective factors
  - income
  - education
  - residence of origin
- subjective factors
  - satisfaction with life domains
    - education
    - employ1nent
    - living environment
    - family relationships
    - health conditions
    - social activities
    - family
  - positive views
    - optimistic about future
    - living condition near expectation
    - not forced to act against wish
    - social respect, not looked down
    - income secure
- social quality factors
  - social cohesion: trust in people
  - social inclusion: access to services
  - social empowerment: voting, memberships, expres opinions