print

Correlational findings

Study Huynh The & Peiser (2016): study VN 2013

Public:
Inhabitants of more and less planned areas, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam, 2013
Survey name:
Unnamed study
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 1055
Non Response:
A; 78%, B: not reported
Assessment:
Multiple assesment methods
A: Web questionnaire B: Face to face interview

Correlate

Authors's Label
Urban patterns
Our Classification
Remarks
a: Area well-planned and built with complete infrastructure since the early 1990s. b: Areas built under the master plans prior to 1975. c: Areas spontaneously developed recently. d: Areas redeveloped from spontaneous development through the government’s moderate intervention, which is basically completed. E: Areas being transformed from spontaneous developments to the established ones.
Distribution
N = a: 75, b: 160, c: 131, d: 622, e: 67
Operationalization
a: Newly planned areas
b: Old-planned areas
c: Spontaneous (unplanned) area
d: Established area (refrence)
e: In-between areas

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SL?-?-sq-v-5-h DM = - - a: M = 3.59
b: M = 3.38
c: M = 3.34
d: M = 3.32
e: M = 2.97
O-SL?-?-sq-v-5-h b = +.13 ns Newly planned areas  (versus established areas] O-SL?-?-sq-v-5-h b = +.21 p < ..05 Old planned area     (versus established areas] O-SL?-?-sq-v-5-h b = -.26 p < ..05 Spontanous area      (versus established areas] O-SL?-?-sq-v-5-h b = -.47 p < ..05 In-between area      (versus established areas)

b controled for
- Personal characteristics
  - education
  - household expenditure
  - chatting with neighbour
  - intention to move
- Housing characteristics
  - type of house
  - owning house
  - housing area
  - value of house
- Area characteristics
  - population density
  - accessibility
    - travel time to work
    - distance to CBD