print

Correlational findings

Study Heintzelman et al. (2019): study ZZ Anglo-America 2016

Public
Adults, Canada and USA, 2016
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 133
Non Response
Assessment
Multiple assesment methods
Online or in person

Correlate

Authors's Label
ENHANCE Happiness Intervention
Our Classification
Remarks
No differences between in person and online mode, so analyzed as 1 group.
Distribution
1a. Online n = 50
1b. In person n = 27
0a. Online n = 50
0b. In person n = 28
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Participants were randomly assigned to
1  ENHANCE. 12 week program with (a) 3 modules focusing on the core self-helping participants identify who they are and
what they want out of life, (b) emphasizes the experiential self-helping participants in their
interactions with their internal and external experiences, (c) 4 modules that focus on the social self, covering aspects important to maintaining healthy close relationships
as well as connections with more distant acquaintances and strangers, and (d) 1 mudule focusing on program reflection, person–activity fit, and habit development.
Each module follows a three-part format with (a) a didactic learning component, (b) an activity to put the principle into practice, and (c) companion writing activities
0  WAITING LIST CONTROL. 12 weeks on waiting list, followed by 12 weeks ENHANCE

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-AB-cm-mq-v-5-fa DM = +              T0    T1    T2    T1-T0  T2-T0
ENHANCE all  1,03  2,06  1,72  +1,03  +0,69   
Controls     1,14  1,26  1,39  +0,12  +0,25
-DIFFERENCE                    +0,91  +0,44
A-AB-cm-mq-v-5-fa D%sr = + ENHANCE all                    + 13%   + 9%  
Controls                       +  2%   + 3%
-DIFFERENCE                    + 11%   + 6%

Change between groups significant for positive affect post treatment (p<0.01)and at follow-up (p<0.05). Change between groups significant for negative affect at post treatment only (p<0.01). Thus change in AB between groups significant post treatment.

T0 Baseline
T1 Post 12 weeks treatment
T2 After 3 months follow-up