Study Gray et al. (2008a): study TH Thailand North 2005
- Public
- + 20 aged, Chai Nai and Kanchnaburi provinces, Thailand, 2005
- Survey name
- Unnamed study
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 5360
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Feeling of relative poverty
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- Question not reported
- Distribution
-
Chainat: 1: 49,9%, 2: 26,6%, 3: 23,6%
Kanchnaburi 1: 40,6%, 2: 41,4%, 3: 18,0% - Related specification variables
-
-
- Operationalization
- Selfreport on feeling of relative poverty:
3 Poorer than neighbours (reference)
2 As poor as neighbours
1 Not poor
Observed Relation with Happiness
Poorer than neighbours M = 4,8 SD = 2,0
As poor as neighbours M = 5,5 SD = 1,7
Not poor M = 6,4 SD = 1,8
Just as poor as neighbour +0.64 (001)
Not poor +1.33 (001)
Poorer than neighbours M = 4,9 SD = 2,0
As poor as neighbours M = 5,6 SD = 1,7
Not poor M = 6,3 SD = 1,6
Just as poor as neighbour +0.49 (001)
Not poor +1.01 (001)
b's controlled for:
- age
- gender
- marital status
- education
- income
- debt
- ownership of house
- sickness last month
- feeling of relative poverty