print

Correlational findings

Study Gray et al. (2008a): study TH Thailand North 2005

Public
+ 20 aged, Chai Nai and Kanchnaburi provinces, Thailand, 2005
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 5360
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Perceived neighbourhood quality
Our Classification
Remarks
Measure and ratings not reported
Distribution
Chainat: 1: 6,1%, 2: 28,3%, 3: 65,5%
Kanchnaburi 1: 7,8%, 2: 33,6%, 3: 58,6%
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Selfreport on quality of the neighbourhood
1 poor
2 good
3 very good

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-FH-c-sq-n-11-e DM = + CHAI NAT
- poor        M = 4,9  SD = 2,1
- good        M = 5,5  SD = 1,9
- very good   M = 6,0  SD = 1,9
M-FH-c-sq-n-11-e b = +.14 p < .001 M-FH-c-sq-n-11-e DM = KANCHANABURI
- poor        M = 5,6  SD = 1,9
- good        M = 5,6  SD = 1,9
- very good   M = 5,9  SD = 1,8
M-FH-c-sq-n-11-e b = +.06 p < .001 b's controlled for:
- age
- gender
- marital status
- education
- income
- debt
- ownership of house
- sickness last month
- feeling of relative poverty