Study Gray et al. (2008a): study TH Thailand North 2005
- Public
- + 20 aged, Chai Nai and Kanchnaburi provinces, Thailand, 2005
- Survey name
- Unnamed study
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 5360
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Perceived neighbourhood quality
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- Measure and ratings not reported
- Distribution
-
Chainat: 1: 6,1%, 2: 28,3%, 3: 65,5%
Kanchnaburi 1: 7,8%, 2: 33,6%, 3: 58,6% - Related specification variables
-
-
- Operationalization
- Selfreport on quality of the neighbourhood
1 poor
2 good
3 very good
Observed Relation with Happiness
- poor M = 4,9 SD = 2,1
- good M = 5,5 SD = 1,9
- very good M = 6,0 SD = 1,9
- poor M = 5,6 SD = 1,9
- good M = 5,6 SD = 1,9
- very good M = 5,9 SD = 1,8
- age
- gender
- marital status
- education
- income
- debt
- ownership of house
- sickness last month
- feeling of relative poverty