print

Correlational findings

Study OECD (2017): study LV 2015

Public:
15-16 aged, secundary school students, Latvia, 2017
Survey name:
INT PISA 2015
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 4869
Non Response:
Assessment:
Questionnaire: web

Correlate

Authors's Label
Family wealth
Our Classification
Remarks
countries added three specific household items that were seen as appropriate measures of family wealth in the country's context
Distribution
quartiles
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Student report of availability at home of:
a: link to internet
b: room of their own
c: number of televisions
d: number of cars
e: rooms with a bath or shower
f:  smartphones
g: computers (desktop, portable laptop or notebook)
h: tablet computers
i: e-book readers

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks C-BW-c-sq-l-11-e DM = + p < .05 Average happiness by national quarter of family wealth
4 most wealthy     M = 7,74
3                  M = 7,45
2                  M = 7,32
1 least wealthy    M = 6,97

4-1 difference        +0,78 C-BW-c-sq-l-11-e D% = +/- p < .05 Percentages by national quarter of family wealth
                Very happy(9+10)  Unhappy(0-4)
4 most wealthy      40,1%           6,4%
3                   32,1%           8.1%
2                   29,4%           8,1%
1 least wealthy     23,8%          13,1%

4-1 difference     +16,3%          -6.7%