Study Sheldon et al. (2010): study US 2008
- Public
- University community members participating in happiness training, USA, 200?
- Survey name
- Unnamed study
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 180
- Non Response
- Assessment
-
Questionnaire: Conputer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI)
1st assessment in laboratory, follow-up assessments via the internet
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Intervention to pursue need-satisfying goals
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- T1 Baseline questionnaires, then brainstorming about possible goals. Then list goals to pursue over the next 6 months. T2, T4, T6 Follow-up at two, four and six months months; questionnaires on happiness, goal progress.
- Distribution
- N per group ranged 44-47
- Operationalization
- Paticipants were randomly assigned to treatment (1) A,B,C or controls (2).
TREATMENT
1A. Set goals to increase feeling of autonomy.
1B. Set goals to increase competence.
1C. Set goals to increase relatedness in life.
CONTROL
0. Set goals to improve life circumstances.
Observed Relation with Happiness
T1 T2 T3 T4 T4 - T1
4.78 4.78 5.02 5.18 +0.40
Hapiness assessed at:
T1 = baseline
T2 = 2 months follow-up
T3 = 4 months follow-up
T4 = 6 months follow-up
+0.04 +0.04 +0.02
Beta's adjusted for
- baseline happiness
- current goal progress
- treatment x progress
Hapiness assessed at:
T1 = baseline
T2 = 2 months follow-up
T3 = 4 months follow-up
T4 = 6 months follow-up
Hapiness assessed at:
T1 = baseline
T4 = 6 months follow-up