print

Correlational findings

Study Page & Vella-Brodrick (2013): study AU New South Wales 2009

Public
Employee well-being trainees and controls, Melbourne, Australia, 200?
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 37
Non Response
Assessment
Multiple assesment methods
Online, paper questionnaires for those who could not access internet at work. T1 questionnaire before the intervention. Intervention group followed a 6-week Working for Wellness Program. Controls did not follow a program but only completed the 4 questionnaires.

Correlate

Authors's Label
Affective well-being at work
Our Classification
Remarks
Affecttive Well-Being Scale (Daniels 2000) Assessed at: T1 baseline T2 treatment (or control) T3 3 months follow-up T4 6 months follow-up
Distribution
66,4% scalerange at T1
Operationalization
Selfreport on 34 questions on feelings at work
during the past week

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.58 p < .01 T1 happiness by T1 affect at work M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = -.11 ns T1 happiness by T2 affect at work M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = -.17 ns T1 happiness by T3 affect at work M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.26 ns T1 happiness by T4 affect at work M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.31 ns T4 happiness by T1 affect at work