Correlational findings

Study Page & Vella-Brodrick (2013): study AU New South Wales 2009

Employee well-being trainees and controls, Melbourne, Australia, 200?
Survey name
Unnamed study
N = 37
Non Response
Multiple assesment methods
Online, paper questionnaires for those who could not access internet at work. T1 questionnaire before the intervention. Intervention group followed a 6-week Working for Wellness Program. Controls did not follow a program but only completed the 4 questionnaires.


Authors's Label
Workplace well-being
Our Classification
Workplace Well-being index (Page 2005) Assessed at: T1 baseline T2 treatment (or control) T3 3 months follow-up T4 6 months follow-up
65,8% scale range at T1
Selfreport on questions about satisfaction with work-domains, such as
- How satissfied are you that your work allows you to use your abilities and knowledge
- How satisfied are you with the meaning of your work
- …
0 completely dissatisfied
10 completely satisfied

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.47 p < .01 T1 happiness by T1 job satisfaction M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.13 ns T1 happiness by T2 job satisfaction M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = -.16 ns T1 happiness by T3 job satisfaction M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.23 ns T1 happiness by T4 job satisfaction M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.33 p < .05 T4 happiness by T1 job satisfaction