print

Correlational findings

Study Cheung & Lucas (2014): study US Washington 2010

Public
18+ aged, general public, Washington, U.S.A., 2010
Survey name
US-BRFSS 2010
Sample
Respondents
N = 13064
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
satisfaction with energy
Our Classification
Remarks
In the original very satisfied was coded 1 and very dissatisfied 4, was reversed by the W.D.H.team.
Operationalization
Selfreport on single question: 'In general how satisfied are you with your energy-level?'
4 very satisfied
3
2
1 very dissatisfied.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLu-g-sq-v-4-dd r = +.40 p < .05 M-CO-u-mq-v-5-e r = +.44 p < .05