Study Luhmann et al. (2014): study US 2013
- Public
- 18-79 aged, general public, USA, 2013
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 414
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Questionnaire: Conputer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI)
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Valence of thoughs when answering question on happiness
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- The content of each thought was coded, i.e. assigned, to a domain (f.e. 'family') by 2 independent decoders to enable quantification of the answers. Domains were career, family, romantic relationships, friends, income, leisure, housing and health
- Distribution
- The number of sources mentioned had a Mean= 2.97 and S.D.=1.41.
- Operationalization
- After completion of the happiness measure respondents were asked to list thoughts/events they have been thinking about answering the happiness questions. R espondents were asked to indicate whether each response was positive. Negative, both or neither. The answers were later classified as:
a Purely positive
b Purely negative
c Ambivalent
d Neutral
Observed Relation with Happiness
- PA: b = +.15 (001)
- NA: b = -.10 (005)
- PA: b = -.15 (001)
- NA: b = +.20 (001)
- PA: b = +.01 (ns)
- NA: b = +.10 (001)
- PA: b = -.03 (ns)
- NA: b = +.07 (ns)