print

Correlational findings

Study Bonikowska et al. (2013): study CA 2009 /2

Public:
15+aged, general public, Canada, 2009-2011
Survey name:
CCHS
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 63000
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: computer assisted (CAPI)
Half of the respondents were interviewed by computer-assisted telephone, the other half by computer-assisted personal interview.

Correlate

Authors's label
Age
Our Classification
Operationalization
1 15-19
2 20-29
3 30-39
4 40-49 (reference)
5 50-59
6 60-69
7 >=70

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-n-11-eb b = + p < .001 Age 15-19 (vs. 40-49)

       b      p<
2009  +.50   .001
2010  +.50   .001
2011  +.42   .001
O-SLW-c-sq-n-11-eb b = + p < .001 Age 20-29 (vs. 40-49)
       b      p<
2009  +.29   .001
2010  +.31   .001
2011  +.24   .001
O-SLW-c-sq-n-11-eb b = + Age 30-39 (vs. 40-49)
       b      p<
2009  +.07    ns
2010  +.15   .001
2011  +.12   .01
O-SLW-c-sq-n-11-eb b = + Age 50-59 (vs. 40-49)
       b      p<
2009  +.06    ns
2010  +.08    ns
2011  +.05    ns
O-SLW-c-sq-n-11-eb b = + p < .001 Age 60-69 (vs. 40-49)
       b      p<
2009  +.36   .001
2010  +.33   .001
2011  +.30   .001
O-SLW-c-sq-n-11-eb b = + p < .001 Age >=70 (vs. 40-49)
       b      p<
2009  +.55   .001
2010  +.50   .001
2011  +.56   .001

b's controlled for:
- sex
- marital status
- number of children
- education
- immigrant
- employment status
- household income
- household size
- homeownership
- selfreported health
- urban area/rural
- geographical region