print

Correlational findings

Study Bonikowska et al. (2013): study CA 2003

Public:
15+ aged, general public, Canada, 2003
Survey name:
CN-GSS 2003
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 24951
Non Response:
22%
Assessment:
Interview: telephone (CATI)

Correlate

Authors's label
Self-reported health
Our Classification
Operationalization
0 Poor
1 Fair
2 Good
4 Very good (reference)
5 Excellent

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-j b = -2.5 p < .01 Poor health      (vs. very good) O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-j b = -1.3 p < .01 Fair health      (vs. very good) O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-j b = -.50 p < .01 Good health      (vs. very good) O-SLW-c-sq-n-10-j b = +.44 p < .01 Excellent health (vs. very good)

b controlled for:
- sex
- age
- marital status
- education
- immigration
- employment status
- household income
- household size
- urban area/rural
- geographic region