print

Correlational findings

Study Ormel (1980): study NL 1970

Public:
15-60 aged, general public, followed 12 month, The Netherlands, 1967-77
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 296
Non Response:
18%
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face
Structured interview

Correlate

Authors's label
Adequacy of coping
Our Classification
Operationalization
Adequacy of coping with reported life- events. Rated by independent judges on a 7-point scale, for each event reported, average score.
Assessed at T2(1976)

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BB-cw-mq-v-4-c r = +.26 p < .01 T2 happiness by T2 adequacy of coping.
A-BB-cw-mq-v-4-c r = +.30 p < .01 T3 happiness by T2 adequacy of coping. A-BB-cw-mq-v-4-c Beta-L = -.08 T2 happiness by T2 adequacy of coping.
ßL path coefficient in a LISREL model, also involving neuroticism, selfesteem, internal control, intimacy with partner, self- and externally induced burdens.
A-BB-cw-mq-v-4-c Beta-L = +.09 T3 happiness by T3 adequacy of coping.
ßL path-coefficient in a LISREL model, also involving neuroticism, selfesteem, internal control, intimacy with partner and quality of life.