print

Correlational findings

Study Dumludag (2015): study ZZ Various nation sets 2006

Public:
18+ aged, general public, Trasition countries, 2006
Survey name:
INT-LiTS 2006
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 16934
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's label
Expenditures on transport and communication
Our Classification
Distribution
Transition (all) = 13.6%; CEB + SEE = 14.4%; CIS + M = 11.3%
Operationalization
Selfreport on single question:
During the past 30 days, approximately how much did your household spend on transport and communication?

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-u b = +.04 p < .01 TRANSITION (ALL) O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-u b = +.07 p < .01 CEB + SEE O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-u b = +.03 ns CIS + M

B's controlled for:
-Age
-Gender
-Household size
-Health
-Education
-Country
-Employment
-Income ladder
O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-u b = +.05 p < .01 SPLIT-UP BY INCOME

Income ladder 1-3
O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-u b = +.03 p < .01 Income ladder 4-6 O-SLW-c-sq-v-5-u b = +.04 p < .01 Income ladder 7-10

B's controlled for:
-Age
-Gender
-Household size
-Health
-Education
-Country
-Employment