print

Correlational findings

Study Linssen et al. (2011): study IN Orrisa 2008

Public
Poor household, rural areas, India, 2008
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 697
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Caste
Our Classification
Distribution
a: 53.08%; b: 33.86%; c: 19.23%
Operationalization
a: Scheduled caste/tribe
b: Backeward caste
c: general caste (reference)

Full question was not reported.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-g-sq-v-5-a b = -.02 ns Scheduled caste/tribe (vs general caste) O-HL-g-sq-v-5-a b = +.01 ns Backeward caste       (vs general caste)

B's controlled for:
-Consumption
-absolute consumption
-conspicuous consumption
-relative consumption
-Village level characteristics
-average village level consumption
-Individual level characteristic
-missed days due to health
-age
-education
-marital status
-religion
-employment status
-gender