Study Layard et al. (2013): study GB 2004
- Public
- 34 aged, United Kingdom, followed from childhood, 2004
- Survey name
- UK-British Cohort Study
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 8868
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Family economic
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- Data set using imputation for missing variables.
- Operationalization
- At age 10;
- Father's socio-ecenomic group
- Family income
- Number of siblings
At age 0,5,10 (average):
- Father in work
Mother's and father's age on leaving full-time education
Observed Relation with Happiness
- Good conduct(at age 5,10,16)
- Intellectual performance(at age 5,10,16)
- Family psychosicial
- Gender (female)
Indirect effect of childhood family economic:
Simulated:
Beta=+.05
Subtraction of total variance in family economic from childhood economic:
Beta=+.03
When limiting family economic up to:
- age 5: beta=+.06
- age 10: beta=+.06
Beta controlled for:
- Good conduct (at age 5,10,16)
- Intellectual performance (at age 5,10,16)
- Family economic
- Gender (female)
- Income
- Employed
- Education
- Good conduct (at age 16,34)
- Self-perceived health (at age 26)
- Emotional health (at age 26)
- family psychosocial
- gender (female)