Study Jiang et al. (2012): study CN 2002
- Public
- 16+ aged general public, 26 cities, China, 2002
- Survey name
- CN-CHIP 2002
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 5630
- Non Response
- Assessment
- Interview: face-to-face
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Gini-coefficient
- Our Classification
-
-
- Remarks
- Difference between income inequality in current city of residence and place of registration (hukou), which is typically a rural area for migrants
- Distribution
- M=0.35 SD=0.03 Range= 0.29-0.41
- Operationalization
- Overall income inequality as distinct from identity-related inequality (hukou status) in the city is calculated:
1 indicates perfect inequality;
0 indicates perfect equality
For urban residents: Income includes wages, bonuses, allowances, subsidies for minimum living standards, living hardship subsidies
from the work unit, second-job and sideline income, and the monetary value of income in kind.
For rural-urban migrants: Income includes wages, revenues from family production,
income from assets, cash gifts, and other income.
Observed Relation with Happiness
- Individual characteristics
a) Rural/urban (Hukou) status
b) Interaction Rural/urban (Hukou) status*
c) Gender
d) Age
e) Marital status
f) Education
g) Health
h) Communist Party Member
i) Unemployed
j) Household income
k) Future income expectations
l) Surface of house
- City characteristics
m) GDP per capita
n) Population growth
o) City size
p) Region in country
- Rural migrants vs urbans differences
q) Education difference between urbans and
migrants
r) Between-group inequality