Study Ek et al. (2008): study FI Northern Finland 1997
- Public
- 31-aged general public, Finland, 1997-1998
- Survey name
- FI-Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 5696
- Non Response
- 21%
- Assessment
- Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Active coping strategies
- Our Classification
-
-
- Related specification variables
-
-
- Operationalization
- Respondents indicated a recent stressful event and then rate their frequency of use of 16 different coping responses.
Rated:
1: Used in a few cases
2: Used in some cases
3: Used a lot (reference)
The 16 coping-reponses were classified into two coping dimensions:
a) passive coping (i.e., efforts to control the stress-related emotions but not the stressful situation)
b) active coping (i.e., taking specific actions to deal directly with a situation).
Observed Relation with Happiness
Men: No controls
- education
- employment history
- migration history
- social support
- passive coping strategies
- attitude towards the future
or when additionally controlled for:
- education
- employment history
- migration history
- social support
- passive coping strategies
- attitude towards the future
Men: No controls
or when additionally controlled for:
- education
- employment history
- migration history
- social support
- passive coping strategies
- attitude towards the future
Odds ratio of 1 means equal happiness, a higher odds ratio than 1 means less happiness, a lower odds ratio than 1 means higher happiness. So active coping is associated with less happiness.