print

Correlational findings

Study Booth & VanOurs (2009): study AU 2001

Public:
Couples, Australia, followed 4 years 2001-2004
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 8170
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's label
Working hours of partner
Our Classification
Operationalization
Hours worked:
Women:
1= 1–10
2= 11–20
3= 21–34
4= 35–40
5= 41–50
6= > 50

Men:
1 1-34
2 35-40
3 41-50
4 > 50

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLu-u-sq-n-11-a OLRC = -,03 ns Women
Men hours work 1-34
O-SLu-u-sq-n-11-a OLRC = +,28 p < .05 Men hours  work 41-50 O-SLu-u-sq-n-11-a OLRC = +,28 p < .05 Men hours  work 41-50 O-SLu-u-sq-n-11-a OLRC = +,25 p < .10 Men hours men work > 50 O-SLu-u-sq-n-11-a OLRC = -,09 ns Men
Women hours work 1-10
O-SLu-u-sq-n-11-a OLRC = +,00 ns Women Hours work 11-20 O-SLu-u-sq-n-11-a OLRC = -,08 ns Women hours work 21-34 O-SLu-u-sq-n-11-a OLRC = -,07 ns Women hours work 35-40 O-SLu-u-sq-n-11-a OLRC = -,09 ns Women hours work 41-50 O-SLu-u-sq-n-11-a OLRC = -,24 ns Women Hours work >50

Coefficients controlled for:
- Child born
- Family income
- Health women
- Hours Women:
1= 1–10
2= 11–20
3= 21–34
4= 35–40
5= 41–50
6= > 50
Health Men
Hours Men:
1 1-34
2 35-40
3 41-50
4 > 50