print

Correlational findings

Study Hayo (2007): study ZZ Eastern Europe 1991

Public:
18+ aged, general public, Eastern European Countries, 1991
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 5592
Non Response:
Assessment:
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's label
Type of employment
Our Classification
Operationalization
A household, student
B full-time employee
C part-time employee
D family helper
E apprentice
F unemployed
G pensioner
H allowance
I widow pension

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLL-u-sq-v-3-b r = A household, student    r=+0.03
B full-time employee    r=+0.05
C part-time employee    r=-0,02
D family helper         r=+0,01
E apprentice            r=-0,01
F unemployed            r=-0,12
G pensioner             r=-0,01
H allowance             r=+0,03
I widow pension         r=-0,03
O-SLL-u-sq-v-3-b OLRC = -.49 p < .01 Household, student (vs. Full-time employee) SE =.15 O-SLL-u-sq-v-3-b OLRC = -.09 ns Part-time (vs. Full-time employee)  SE =.23 O-SLL-u-sq-v-3-b OLRC = -.30 ns Family helper (vs.full time employee)SE =.44 O-SLL-u-sq-v-3-b OLRC = -.08 ns Apprentice (vs. Full-time employee) SE =.84 O-SLL-u-sq-v-3-b OLRC = -.68 p < .01 Unemployed (vs.full-time employee) SE =.12 O-SLL-u-sq-v-3-b OLRC = .07 ns Pensioner (vs. Full-time employee)  SE =.08 O-SLL-u-sq-v-3-b OLRC = .05 ns Allowance (vs. Full-time employee) SE=.18 O-SLL-u-sq-v-3-b OLRC = -.31 ns Widow pension (vs full-time employee)  SE =.31

lgt's controlled for:
- country
- age
- gender
- marital status
- education
- income
- community size
- church attendance
- religion

No substantial changes in reduced logit model