print

Correlational findings

Study Hawkins & Booth (2005): study US 1980

Public:
Couples, USA, followed 12 years, 1980-1992
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 1150
Non Response:
35%
Assessment:
Interview: telephone (CATI)

Correlate

Authors's label
Divorced/Remarried
Our Classification
Operationalization
1 Ss who divorced in T2 or T3 and then remarried T3 or T4.
0 other

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-HL-c-sq-v-3-ad r = -.04 ns T1 Happiness (1980) O-HL-c-sq-v-3-ad r = -.02 ns T4 Happiness (1992) O-HL-c-sq-v-3-ad Beta = +.24 p < .01 T4 happiness
Controlling for
- Continuously married
- Divorced/Unmarried
O-HL-c-sq-v-3-ad Beta = +.19 p < .05 T1-T4 change in happiness(T4 happiness controlling T1 happiness)
Controlling for
- Continuously married
- Divorced/Unmarried
O-HL-c-sq-v-3-ad Beta = +.20 p < .05 T1-T4 change in happiness(T4 happiness controlling T1 happiness)
Controlling for
- Continuously married
- Divorced/Unmarried
- Age
- Gender
- White
- Years of education
- Family income
- Number of children
- Stepchild
- Religiosity
- Remarried
- Cohabited