print

Correlational findings

Study Diener et al. (1995b): study US Illinois 1990

Public:
College students, USA, 199?
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 221
Non Response:
Assessment:
Questionnaire: paper

Correlate

Authors's label
Physical attractiveness
Our Classification
Operationalization
Atractiveness was rated by 10 raters on a 10 point scale in the basis of still photographs(frontal and profile) and videos of paricipants interacting with each other

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-FH-g-sq-v-10-a r = +.04 ns Frontal photographs
- Women r=-.07, ns
- Men   r=+.11, ns
A-AB-?-mq-?-0-b r = +.10 ns - Women r=+.08, ns
- Men   r=+.12, ns
M-FH-g-sq-v-10-a r = +.14 p < .05 Profile photograph
- Women r=-.02, ns
- Men   r=+.22, p<.05
A-AB-?-mq-?-0-b r = +.12 ns - Women r=-.09, ns
- Men   r=+.13, ns
M-FH-g-sq-v-10-a r = +.08 ns Videotape
- Women r=+.05, ns
- Men   r=+.13, ns
A-AB-?-mq-?-0-b r = +.09 ns - Women r=+.09, ns
- Men   r=+.07, ns