print

Correlational findings

Study Hernandez Plaza et al. (2004): study ES 2000

Public
Moroccan immigrants, Spain, 2000
Sample
Respondents
N = 100
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face
Face to face interviews were conducted by the first author of this article, with the collaboration of seven Moroccan mediators who translated the questions into Arabic when necessary and gave access to the sample

Correlate

Authors's Label
Satistaction with social support
Our Classification
Error Estimates
Cronbach's alpha = 0,86
Remarks
The measurement of satisfaction with social support used is included in the Arizona Social Support Interview Schedule (Barrera, 1980). More specifically, the version adapted for African immigrants living in Spain by Martinez, Garcia and Maya (1993) and Hernández (2003) was used. This instrument examines diverse structural and functional characteristics of social support networks.
Distribution
Satisfaction with social support:
M = 5,67; SD = 0,89
1. Moderate satisfaction: 47%
2. High satisfaction: 53%
Operationalization
Satisfaction with social support is measured by 6 items with a 7-point Likert forman (1, totally insatisfied; 7, totally satisfied), that provide information about the level of satisfaction with received support in the following areas: expression of personal feelings, social participation, advice, positive feedback, material support and physical assistance
For current analysis, this variable was re-cathegorized in three levels:
1. Low satisfaction; Between 1 and 2.99
2. Moderate satisfaction: Between 3 and 5
3. High satisfaction: Between 5.01 and 7
All the scores were higher than 3, so the final variable had only two levels:
1. Moderate satisfaction: Between 3 and 5
2. High satisfaction: Between 5.01 and 7

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-CO-u-mq-v-5-ba DM = + 1 moderate    M = 1,56; SD = 0,72
2 high        M = 1,72; SD = 0,86
M-CO-u-mq-v-5-ba F = 19.6 p < .000 Univariate analysis of variance, main effect
Controlling for:
- gender
- age
M-CO-u-mq-v-5-ba F = 5.61 p < .020 Univariate analysis of variance: interaction effects, satisfaction with social support x housing type
Controlling for:
- gender
- age

Adequate housing
- Moderate satisfaction: M = 1,46; SD = 0,52
- High satisfaction: M = 2,83; SD = 0,90
Sub-standard housing
- Moderate satisfaction: M = 1,39; SD = 0,58
- High satisfaction: M = 1,65; SD = 0,77
M-CO-u-mq-v-5-ba F = 0.08 ns Univariate analysis of variance: interaction effects, satisfaction with social support x legal situation
Controlling for:
- gender
- age
M-CO-u-mq-v-5-ba F = 0.11 ns Univariate analysis of variance: interaction effects, satisfaction with social support x labour situation
Controlling for:
- gender
- age
M-CO-u-mq-v-5-ba F = 9.62 p < .003 Univariate analysis of variance: interaction effects, satisfaction with social support x perception of rejection
Controlling for:
- gender
- age

Low perception of rejection
- Moderate satisfaction: M = 1,43; SD = 0,64
- High satisfaction: M = 3,16; SD = 0,69
High perception of rejection
- Moderate satisfaction: M = 1,40; SD = 0,55
- High satisfaction: M = 1,68; SD = 0,78