print

Correlational findings

Study Cummins et al. (2005): study AU 2001

Public
18+ aged, general public, Australia, 2004
Sample
Respondents
N = 24000
Non Response
0
Assessment
Interview: telephone (CATI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Satisfaction with community
Our Classification
Related specification variables
Operationalization
community

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-ca r = +.35 in highly accessible cities O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-ca Beta = +.06 controlled for satisfaction with:
standard of living
health
acievements
personal relationships
safety and
future security O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-ca r = +.35 In accessible cities O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-ca Beta = +.08 controlled for satisfaction with:
standard of living
health
acievements
personal relationships
safety and
future security O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-ca r = +.35 In moderately cities O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-ca Beta = +.05 controlled for satisfaction with:
standard of living
health
acievements
personal relationships
safety and
future security O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-ca r = +.32 In remote cities O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-ca Beta = +.09 controlled for satisfaction with:
standard of living
health
acievements
personal relationships
safety and
future security O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-ca r = +.34 In very remote cities O-SLW-u-sq-n-11-ca Beta = +.09 controlled for satisfaction with:
standard of living
health
acievements
personal relationships
safety and
future security