Study Wright et al. (2002): study US 1997
- Public
- Public-sector managers, USA, 2002, followed 2 years
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 59
- Non Response
- 17
- Assessment
-
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)
Work performance rated by management.
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Composite job satisfaction
- Our Classification
-
-
- Error Estimates
- Cronbach alpha: .68
- Distribution
- M= 3,2 SD = 0,8
- Operationalization
- Selfreport of satisfaction with:
- work itself
- co-workers
- supervision
Rated on a 5 point scale ranging from (1) very unsatisfied to (5) very satisfied.These 3 items were summed to form a composite measure of job satisfaction.
Assessed at T1.