print

Correlational findings

Study Wright et al. (2002): study US 1997

Public
Public-sector managers, USA, 2002, followed 2 years
Sample
Respondents
N = 59
Non Response
17
Assessment
Questionnaire: paper
Work performance rated by management.

Correlate

Authors's Label
Composite job satisfaction
Our Classification
Error Estimates
Cronbach alpha: .68
Distribution
M= 3,2 SD = 0,8
Operationalization
Selfreport of satisfaction with:
- work itself
- co-workers
- supervision

Rated on a 5 point scale ranging from (1) very unsatisfied to (5) very satisfied.These 3 items were summed to form a composite measure of job satisfaction.
Assessed at T1.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BB-u-mq-v-3-e r = +.03 ns T1 happiness by T1 composite job satisfaction