print

Correlational findings

Study Wright & Staw (1999): study US 1994 /1

Public
Social services staff personel; USA, 199?, followed 1 year
Sample
Respondents
N = 78
Non Response
26
Assessment
Questionnaire: paper
Work performance rated by supervisor.

Correlate

Authors's Label
Global rated performance
Our Classification
Distribution
M= 3,8 SD=0,7 N= 64
Operationalization
Rating by supervisory at T1 using the question: 'Overall, how would you rate this employee's performance over the past week?'
Answer rated on a 5 point scale ranging from poor to excellent.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BB-u-mq-v-3-e r = +.32 p < .05 T1 work performance by T1 happiness A-BB-u-mq-v-3-e r = +.27 p < .05 T1 work performance by T2 happiness (1 year later)