Study Wright & Staw (1999): study US 1994 /1
- Public
- Social services staff personel; USA, 199?, followed 1 year
- Sample
- Respondents
- N = 78
- Non Response
- 26
- Assessment
-
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)
Work performance rated by supervisor.
Correlate
- Authors's Label
- Global rated performance
- Our Classification
-
-
- Distribution
- M= 3,8 SD=0,7 N= 64
- Operationalization
- Rating by supervisory at T1 using the question: 'Overall, how would you rate this employee's performance over the past week?'
Answer rated on a 5 point scale ranging from poor to excellent.