print

Correlational findings

Study Wright & Bonett (1997): study US 1996

Public
Criminal justice staff personnel; USA; followed 2 years, 199?
Sample
Respondents
N = 76
Non Response
18
Assessment
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)
Work performance rated by top-ranking supervisor.

Correlate

Authors's Label
Support
Our Classification
Distribution
M = 3,8 SD = 0,8
Operationalization
Rating of performance over last 6 months by manager using the question: 'To what extent does this employee pay attention to what you are saying when talking to them?
1: never
:
5: always.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BB-u-mq-v-3-e r = +.19 ns T1 happiness by T3 work performance(2 years lag) A-BB-u-mq-v-3-e r = +.23 ns T2 happiness by T3 work performance(1 year lag) A-BB-u-mq-v-3-e r = +.21 ns T1+T2 happiness by T3 work performance