print

Correlational findings

Study Sullivan et al. (1991): study US 1988

Public
Former inpatients of mental hospital, Mississipi, 1988
Sample
Respondents
N = 130
Non Response
22%
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face
At home by mental health case managers

Correlate

Authors's Label
normal vs mentally ill
Our Classification
Remarks
Samples b and c from Andrews and Withey(1976)
Distribution
N: 1a=1,297, 1b=122, 1c=106, 2a=101, 2b=278, 2c=66
Operationalization
1 Non-mentally-ill
  a national population
  b low socio-economic subsample
  c black-subsample

2 Seriously mentally ill
  a Missisippi
  b Los Angeles
  c Maryland

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-DT-u-sq-v-7-a DM = - 1. Non-mentally-ill       M = 5.3
   a national population  M = 5.4
   b low socio-economic   M = 5.1
   c black-subsample      M = 4.8

2 seriously mentally ill  M = 4.7
   a Missisippi           M = 5.3
   b Los Angeles          M = 4.4
   c Maryland             M = 5.2