print

Correlational findings

Study Jacob & Brinkerhoff (1997): study US 1989

Public:
'Back to the land' mini farmers, USA,1989
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 565
Non Response:
43,8
Assessment:
Questionnaire: paper
Mailed questionnaire

Correlate

Authors's label
Technical Self Reliance
Our Classification
Operationalization
Index calculated by multiplying tools or technology, possessed by a respondent by the efficiency rating claimed for the particular technology, resulting in the sum of the efficiency rating for each of the 25 tools.

The tools are: 1.garden, 2. greenhouse, 3.root cellar, 4.fish pond, 5. solar heat, 6.pigs, 7.wood lot, 8.wood stove heat, 9.wood stove cooking, 10.composting privy, 11.hydro-electric system, 12.graywater(waste water) 13.solar water heater, 14.chickens, 15.goats, 16.beef cattle, 17.milk cow(s) 18.sheep, 19.wind power, 20.weeder geese, 21.bees, 22.fruit trees, 23.butcher larger anaimals, 24.photo voltaic power, 45.work horses.

Efficiency is evaluated by asking the respondents about the effectiveness of the tool items of 'providing your family with independence or self-reliance from a one (not at all effective) to four(very effective point sequence.
The TSR index-scores have a theoretical range between 0-100

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-H?-?-sq-v-4-a r = +.05 Ss, who value technical self reliance high, irrespectible of their performance (N=±280)
-high Country Asceticism     r=+.26 p<.005
-high Homestead Production   r=+.27 p<.005
-high Ecological Sensitivity r=+.18 p<.005

Ss, who value Homestead Food Production high, irrespectable their performance, (N=±280)
-high Country Asceticism     r=+.32 p<.005
-high Homestead Production   r=+.32 p<.005
-high Ecological Sensitivity r=+.22 p<.005