print

Correlational findings

Study Brinkerhoff et al. (1997): study IN Other place in India 1996 /1

Public:
Adult, general public, poor rural village, Bhopalpani, India 1991
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 0
Non Response:
108
Assessment:
Questionnaire: paper

Correlate

Authors's label
Irrigation
Our Classification
Remarks
Items for pairwise comparison were selected by participant observation and open interviews
Distribution
0: 1,74; 1: 11,0; 2: 27,5; 3: 37,6; M: 23,9.
Operationalization
Family needs prioritized by Paired Comparisons.Out of four basic needs
ss were asked to compare two at a time and to select, which they sought 'their family needs most'
Items were:
-food
-health
-employment
-leisure
This leads to six pairs of comparisons.
Score pro need can be:
0. not mentioned
1. once
2. twice
3. three times
Needs index is the mean number of times an item is chosen.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Special Research Type Elaboration / Remarks M-FH-?-sq-f-7-a r = -.05 ns none O-SLu-?-sq-l-5-a r = -.18 ns none