print

Correlational findings

Study Brinkerhoff et al. (1997): study IN Other place in India 1996 /1

Public:
Adult, general public, poor rural village, Bhopalpani, India 1991
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 0
Non Response:
108
Assessment:
Questionnaire: paper

Correlate

Authors's Label
Food
Our Classification
Remarks
Items for pairwise comparison were selected by participant observation and open interviews
Distribution
0: 1,44; 1: 13,8; 2: 40,4; 3: 33,9; M: 11,9
Operationalization
Family needs prioritized by Paired Comparisons.Out of four basic needs
ss were asked to compare two at a time and to select, which they sought 'their family needs most'
Items were:
-food
-health
-employment
-leisure
This leads to six pairs of comparisons.
Score pro need can be:
0. not mentioned
1. once
2. twice
3. three times
Needs index is the mean number of times an item is chosen.-

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-FH-?-sq-f-7-a r = -.02 ns O-SLu-?-sq-l-5-a r = -.05 ns