print

Correlational findings

Study Brinkerhoff et al. (1997): study IN Other place in India 1996

Public
Adult, general public, poor rural village, Barasi, India 1991
Sample
Respondents
N = 234
Non Response
0
Assessment
Questionnaire: paper

Correlate

Authors's Label
Perceived village needs: Training centre for women
Our Classification
Remarks
Items for pairwise comparison were selected by participant observation and open interviews
Distribution
0: 0,90% 1: 38,5%; 2: 38,0%; 3: 18,8%
M: 4,7%
Operationalization
Village needs prioritized by Paired Comparisons.Out of four basic needs
ss were asked to compare two at a time and to select, which they sought 'their community needs most'
Items were
- school for boys
- school for girls
- repair irrigation
- training center for women
This leads to six pairs of comparisons.
Score pro need can be:
0. not mentioned
1. once
2. twice
3. three times
Needs index is the mean number of times an item is chosen.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLu-?-sq-l-5-a r = +.05 ns M-FH-?-sq-f-7-a r = +.13 p < .05