print

Correlational findings

Study Brinkerhoff et al. (1997): study IN Other place in India 1996

Public:
Adult, general public, poor rural village, Barasi, India 1991
Sample:
Respondents:
N = 234
Non Response:
0
Assessment:
Questionnaire: paper

Correlate

Authors's Label
Perceived family needs: Leisure
Our Classification
Remarks
Items for pairwise comparison were selected by participant observation and open interviews
Distribution
0: 0,94%; 1: 37,2%; 2: 36,8%; 3: 21,4%
M: 4,7%
Operationalization
Family needs prioritized by Paired Comparisons.Out of four basic needs
ss were asked to compare two at a time and to select, which they sought 'their family needs most'
Items were:
-food
-health
-employment
-leisure
This leads to six pairs of comparisons.
Score pro need can be:
0. not mentioned
1. once
2. twice
3. three times
Needs index is the mean number of times an item is chosen.

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-FH-?-sq-f-7-a r = +.20 p < .001 O-SLu-?-sq-l-5-a r = +03 ns