print

Correlational findings

Study Page & Vella-Brodrick (2013): study AU New South Wales 2009

Public
Employee well-being trainees and controls, Melbourne, Australia, 200?
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 37
Non Response
Assessment
Multiple assesment methods
Online, paper questionnaires for those who could not access internet at work. T1 questionnaire before the intervention. Intervention group followed a 6-week Working for Wellness Program. Controls did not follow a program but only completed the 4 questionnaires.

Correlate

Authors's Label
Psychological wellbeing
Our Classification
Error Estimates
Cronbach alpha ,90
Remarks
Ryff( 1989) Psychological Well-being scale.
Distribution
68,5% scale range at T1
Operationalization
Self report on 42 questions about
a: self-acceptance
b: personal growth
c: environmental mastery
d; autonomy
e: purpose in life
f: positive relations with others

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.82 p < .01 T1 happiness by T1 psychological well-being M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.64 p < .01 T1 happiness by T2 psychological well-being M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.15 ns T1 happiness by T3 psychological well-being M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.57 p < .01 T1 happiness by T4 psychological well-being M-AO-*-mq-v-5-a r = +.64 p < .01 T4 happiness by T1 psychological well-being