print

Correlational findings

Study Cheung & Lucas (2014): study US Washington 2010

Public
18+ aged, general public, Washington, U.S.A., 2010
Survey name
US-BRFSS 2010
Sample
Respondents
N = 13064
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
overall health
Our Classification
Remarks
In the original excellent health was coded 1 and poor health 5, was reversed by the W.D.H.team.
Operationalization
Selfreport on single question: ' would you say that in general your health is ..... : '
5 excellent
4
3
2
1 poor

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLu-g-sq-v-4-dd r = +.33 p < .05 M-CO-u-mq-v-5-e r = +.34 p < .05