print

Correlational findings

Study Sumnall & Bellis (2010): study ZZ 2010

Public
16-35 aged night scene public, 9 European cities, 2008
Sample
Respondents
N = 1363
Non Response
Assessment
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)
by post

Correlate

Authors's Label
Income
Our Classification
Operationalization
Self reported  relative level of  income:
1 Low (reference)
2 Medium
3 High

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks O-SLW-u-sq-v-2-b D% = p < .001 % happy:
-low income    73%  
-medium income 83%  
-high income   90%
O-SLW-u-sq-v-2-b b = +.69 ns Medium   (vs low) CI95 [0,45-1,07] O-SLW-u-sq-v-2-b b = +.33 p < .001 High     (vs low) CI95 [0,20-0,85]

b's  controlled for:
- sociodemographic factors
  - sexe
  - age
- subjective wellbeing
  - considered suicide in the last year
  - felt sad and hopeless
  - health in the last month
- use of stimulants
  - times drunk last month
  - use of cannabis
  - age first use of cocaine
  - age first use ecstasy
- country